Education for Sustainable Food Consumption in Home and Consumer Studies
Brister i skolledningarnas förståelse för ämnet hem- och konsumentkunskap och dess potentiella kunskapsbidrag reducerar möjligheten att agera som en viktig aktör för hållbar matkonsumtion. Det visar Emmalee Gisslevik i sin avhandling.
Emmalee Gisslevik
Professor Christel Larsson, Göteborgs universitet Professor Inga Wernersson, Högskolan Väst
Professor Inger M Jonsson, Örebro universitet
Göteborgs universitet
2018-03-02
Education for Sustainable Food Consumption in Home and Consumer Studies
Education for Sustainable Food Consumption in Home and Consumer Studies
Education as a means to enable sustainable food consumption has gained increasing recognition as a vital means to decrease current burdens upon both natural resources and human health. In response, the Swedish compulsory school subject of home and consumer studies, which positions education about food as core content, has been revised to incorporate in its national syllabus a perspective of sustainable development since 2011. However, because sustainable development remains an ambiguous, contested concept with a range of definitions and interpretations, it is necessary to gain better understanding of what incorporating its perspective can entail in home and consumer studies, particularly regarding the core food-related content knowledge that it teaches. Building upon four papers, this thesis reports research guided by an interpretive and exploratory approach that involved analysing data from syllabuses, observations, recordings of in-class lessons and interviews with practising teachers. The results reveal two ways of understanding what incorporating a perspective of sustainable development can entail in home and consumer studies in Sweden. The first understanding proposes an enriched and unified practice in which the curriculum prioritises embodied forms of knowledge about healthy, ethical and resource-efficient food consumption by allowing a multi-relational, systems thinking approach while focusing a homemade meal practice. By contrast, the second understanding proposes a practice riddled with inconsistencies and contradictions in providing teaching and learning opportunities to attain the intended goals. This ultimately results in fragmented learning opportunities focused more on informed reasoning than on informed actions. Taken together, both understandings pose theoretical, conceptual and practical implications, both for home and consumer studies in particular and in education for sustainable food consumption in general.